Top-order trio give Bangladesh a good selection problem

Neil McKenzie has called for more consistency among Bangladesh’s batsmen after impressive hundreds from Imrul Kayes and Soumya Sarkar

Mohammad Isam26-Oct-2018Soumya Sarkar in full flow, driving on the up, cutting smoothly, crashing spinners over midwicket with a cross-legged follow-through, is a sight to behold. But it is rare, and his 117 against Zimbabwe in the third ODI was his first in international cricket in more than three years.Imrul Kayes finished the series with rare consistency, hammering 144, 90 and 115 to become the second highest run-getter in a three-match ODI series, just 11 runs behind the 360 Babar Azam made against West Indies in 2016. Both Soumya and Imrul have only just returned to the ODI squad, midway through the Asia Cup.Liton Das had two bad games on either side of a sublime 83. He also made 120 against India in the Asia Cup final. It is going to be hard to not consider any of these three batsmen when the selectors pick the next ODI squad, against West Indies in December.Bangladesh batting coach Neil McKenzie said that batsmen like Soumya, Imrul, Liton and Mohammad Mithun have to continue being consistent due to the competition for places once Shakib Al Hasan and Tamim Iqbal return to the side from injuries.”When you have a lot of competition for places, you have to be consistent,” McKenzie told ESPNcricinfo. “It is no use getting a hundred and then nought, nought, five, seven. If you just look outside the squad and the guys who didn’t get to bat today, just look at how much batting you’ve got. There’s a lot of batting coming through. It is all about competition for places. It would make selection a little bit tricky. You have to select what’s best for the team.”McKenzie said that if more of Bangladesh’s batsmen think like Soumya did in Chittagong, by trusting his own method, style and techniques, they could bat at higher tempo, show more consistency and bat with more confidence.”It is nice to see them get rewards for their hard work,” he said. “A guy like Soumya has so much happening for him. He is a great striker of the ball, he is tall and imposing on the opposition. It is down to some confidence. He got a hundred against Zimbabwe in the warm-up game. He got some runs in the domestic games.”It is all about confidence and trusting your game plans. I think they are allowed to be themselves in this environment. They have to bat like Soumya does. You can’t bat like anyone else. You have to trust your own style.”McKenzie, known among his coaching staff as someone who becomes restless when batsmen play dots, said that Bangladeshi players have a talent for finding gaps as much as possible, and ensuring ones and twos are not missed. It sets them up for big hits – a case in point being the nine sixes they hit in this game.”It is down to game plans: when to hit and when not to hit, and hit spaces. We talk a lot about the skillsets of a Bangladeshi batsman. There’s no use trying to bat like West Indians or South Africans. You have to bat like a Bangladeshi. Use your skills.”Bangladeshi batsmen hit space. They should be agile between wickets. They are very skilled hitters. Hit space and run hard, and the big hits will follow. We have had some big sixes there. Guys were in good positions, and it comes from confidence.”One of the things that McKenzie has stressed upon is using the depth of the crease and not reacting too slowly to certain bowlers. Bangladesh’s struggle against Rashid Khan this year is well documented but in the must-win Asia Cup game in Abu Dhabi, Mahmudullah and Imrul batted sensibly against him, mostly by not moving on to the front foot when the bowler is delivering the ball.”I think it is just positions with the spinners. I think a lot of the time we get into position a little bit too late,” McKenzie said. “We are still moving our front foot when the ball is being released. By being nice and set as the bowler is about to release the ball, it gives you options off the front and back foot.”With a guy like Rashid Khan, who is quick in the air, we played him a little bit too rushed. Getting into an early position that you can transfer your weight forward and back, and a lot of the emphasis, chatting to Steve [Rhodes], is on having opportunities to score off the front and back foot.”Bangladesh have treated Zimbabwe’s spinners with disdain in this ODI series, something that has come from their confidence in dealing with spinners in the Asia Cup. “A lot of our guys today are very happy with good drives through the covers but when it is slightly short you see them jumping back quite far back on to their stumps,” McKenzie said. “Either cutting it square or picking up over midwicket. I think it is just that early position and giving yourself options.”The three batsmen in Bangladesh’s top order have shown in this ODI series that following their own style and sticking to batting plans brings rewards. Anamul Haque failed to cement his place in the ODI opening slot despite being given seven chances this year. Nazmul Hossain Shanto struggled in three Asia Cup matches before Liton, Imrul and Soumya raised the stakes in the space of four ODIs.So who will open with Tamim when he returns to the side? Normally, the answer was a difficult one because no one else would be scoring, a problem that has been as lengthy as Soumya’s drop in form since 2016.It remains a difficult answer, but only because there are now three candidates for two vacant top-order places.

Ben Foakes becomes the fifth keeper to score a century on Test debut

The key stats as Ben Foakes makes history on the second morning in Galle

Gaurav Sundararaman07-Nov-201820 Players to score a century on debut for England. Ben Foakes joined this elite list when he made 107 runs from 202 balls. His teammate Keaton Jennings was the last batsman to do so for England when he scored 112 against India at Mumbai in 2016 4 Batsmen from England to score a century on debut in Asia. Foakes joined Jennings, Alastair Cook and Bryan Valentine. Incidentally, the other three scored their centuries in India. Foakes is the first from England to do so in Sri Lanka.2 Batsmen who are not from Asia to score a century in Sri Lanka on debut – Foakes joins Shaun Marsh in achieving this feat. In all there have been eight batsmen to score a hundred on debut in Sri Lanka, five of them from the visiting nation. Foakes and Brendon Kuruppu are the only players to do so in the first innings of a Test match.5 Wicketkeepers to score a century on Test debut. Foakes is only the second keeper from England to do so after Matt Prior. Incidentally three of the five centuries were scored in Sri Lanka. No keeper had previously scored a century in Sri Lanka from England. The previous highest was 79 by Prior in 2007.239 Runs added for the last five wickets by England in the first innings – the second-highest in Asia for England and highest in Sri Lanka. The last instance of England adding more than 239 runs for the last five wickets in Asia was in Delhi against India in 1976-77.8 Five-wicket hauls for Sri Lanka against England at home. Dilruwan Perera is the first spinner not named Muttiah Muralitharan or Rangana Herath to achieve this feat. Herath took three such hauls when England toured Sri Lanka in 2012.

Holder, pace attack at the centre of West Indies' mini-revival

While still inconsistent, West Indies have been winning Tests more often recently, putting an end to a barren run that has spanned the last several years

S Rajesh28-Jan-2019West Indies’ whopping 381-run win in Barbados – their second-largest ever in terms of runs against England – was their eighth win in their last 21 matches. Given their relatively barren run over the last several years, that is a bit of a revival, though it also needs to be noted that they have lost 11 Tests during this period, and were thrashed by both India and Bangladesh – losing each series 2-0 – just before this series.What should encourage West Indies supporters is the fact that, while the inconsistencies remain, wins against higher-ranked teams have started coming more often lately. In these 21 Tests, they have notched up two wins each against England and Pakistan, and one against Sri Lanka; apart from that, they also have two against Bangladesh and one against Zimbabwe.

WI, in their last two 21-Test blocks

Period Tests W/L Bat ave Bowl: pace Bowl: spinOct 30, ’16 onwards 21 8/11 25.93 25.59 37.17Sep 5, ’14 to Oct 29, ’16 21 3/13 26.99 42.7 47.23There was a period between 2012 and 2014 when West Indies had a slightly better win-loss ratio, 9-11, in 24 Tests. However, six of those nine wins had come against Bangladesh – who were a much poorer side then than they are now – and Zimbabwe.Two factors have chiefly contributed to these wins: the bowling, more specifically their pace attack, and the captain, who also happens to be their best batsman bowler during this period. Here are more numbers on these two aspects of West Indies’ cricket over the last two-and-a-half years.The pace resurgencePace was the cornerstone of West Indies’ dominance in the 1980s, and it seems to be playing a part in their revival now. Since October 30, 2016, West Indies’ seamers have averaged 25.59; only South Africa’s fast bowlers have done better in this period, averaging 21.50.

In the previous 21 Tests, West Indies’ pacers had averaged 42.70, which was worse than all those of all teams except Bangladesh. This resurgence of their pace attack has made the biggest difference; the spinners have improved their average from 47.23 to 37.17, but the batting numbers have actually dipped in this period: West Indies’ batsmen average 25.93 runs per wicket, compared to 26.99 in the previous 21 Tests. Given this reliance on pace, it isn’t surprising that West Indies struggled in the subcontinent, where conditions were generally more favourable for spin.Three of West Indies’ seamers – Jason Holder, Kemar Roach and Shannon Gabriel – have taken 40-plus wickets at sub-25 averages during this period, which is reminiscent of West Indies’ fast-bowling numbers during their glory years. From the start of 2000, until this phase, West Indies’ fast bowlers averaged 35.87, which means they have shaved off more than 10 runs from that average in the last couple of years.

WI fast bowlers with 40+ wickets since Oct 30, 2016

Player Mat Wkts Ave SR 5WIJason Holder 17 62 20.61 49.3 5Kemar Roach 14 49 23.18 45.4 3Shannon Gabriel 19 76 24.64 44.4 4The Holder phenomenonThe West Indies captain leads the batting bowling averages for his team during this period (among players who have played more than one Test). He is also second in catches taken by non-wicketkeepers, and he has pulled these feats off while shouldering the captaincy. Jason Holder has been West Indies’ Superman in these last two years. He hasn’t played four Tests in this period, and West Indies’ results in those four games are as follows:- Lost by 240 runs v New Zealand, Hamilton
– Lost by an innings & 272 runs v India, Rajkot
– Lost by 64 runs v Bangladesh, Chattogram
– Lost by an innings and 184 runs v Bangladesh, MirpurClearly, Holder has been West Indies’ talisman. Among all the West Indies players who have played more than one Test, Holder’s batting average of 39.04 is the highest, while his bowling average of 20.61 is third among fast bowlers with 40-plus wickets during this period. Top fast bowlers in Tests since Oct 30, 2016 (Min 40 wkts)

Player Mat Wkts Ave SR 5WIDuanne Olivier 8 41 18.19 27.6 3Mohammad Abbas 14 66 18.86 46.0 4Jason Holder 17 62 20.61 49.3 5Kagiso Rabada 27 139 20.77 38.3 6James Anderson 27 107 21.05 52.9 6Holder is also the only player to score 750-plus runs and take 30-plus wickets in Tests since October 30, 2016. Holder’s ability to perform at his best with both bat and ball while also leading the team puts him in truly elite company in an all-time list: he is one of only nine captains to achieve the double of 1000 runs and 50 wickets, while the difference of 6.96 between his batting average (33.68) and bowling average (26.72) is third in this list, next only to the legendary Imran Khan and Garry Sobers. Not surprisingly, he is currently on top of ICC’s rankings for Test allrounders.

Captains with 1000+ runs and 50+ wkts in Tests

Player Mat Runs Bat Av Wkts Bowl Av Ave diffImran Khan 48 2408 52.34 187 20.26 32.08Garry Sobers 39 3528 58.80 117 34.00 24.80Jason Holder 28 1381 33.68 72 26.72 6.96Daniel Vettori 32 1917 39.12 116 33.38 5.73Kapil Dev 34 1364 31.72 111 26.35 5.36John Reid 34 2129 34.33 54 30.12 4.20Heath Streak 21 1013 36.17 56 34.80 1.37Ray Illingworth 31 1288 28.62 51 35.96 -7.33Darren Sammy 30 1032 22.43 57 39.61 -17.17All Holder needs now is a little more help from the batsmen, to take West Indies to the next level in Test cricket.

Super Kings v Royal Challengers: The derby dossier

It’s been a while since this blockbuster came round to the MA Chidambaram stadium and here are all the reasons why you should go gaga over it

Varun Shetty in Chennai23-Mar-20192:44

CSK, RCB hit the nets ahead of IPL season-opener

It didn’t happen in Chennai last yearOr the year before that. Or the year before that, as a Royal Challengers fan is wont to keep reminding a Super Kings fan. First it was Super Kings’ suspension that kept this scrumptious fixture away from locals. Then, last year, an issue that’s older than the two franchises – the Cauvery water dispute. On that front, it was a rivalry so old that Royal Challengers’ merely being in Chennai might have been more dangerous than Royal Challengers attempting to play in Chennai.Not that Pune was all puppies and rainbows, though, or Bengaluru for that matter. Royal Challengers lost both derby games last year. And the year before that. And the year before that…Kohli v Dhoni up a notchGautam Gambhir doesn’t think Virat Kohli is on the same level as Rohit Sharma or MS Dhoni when it comes to IPL captaincy, and that is just one of the things that increases the attention on him when he goes up against Dhoni in Chennai, which is not an easy task.”Every team that comes to Chennai has to be considered underdogs because CSK have done so well at home. MS knows exactly what he wants from his team in these conditions. We all have seen that and are aware of it. It’s very easy to be overawed by the support that CSK are going to get. In the IPL, people can get carried away by the support that a team like CSK gets at home but we have to focus on our basics,” Kohli said on the eve of the match.MS Dhoni and Virat Kohli in Chennai before the IPL 2019 opening game•PTI The southern monopolyChennai and Bengaluru have always been massive sporting centres in India, and at the moment are experiencing some shared joy.Over the last year, the Bengaluru teams won in the premier badminton, kabbadi, and football leagues, while the Chennai teams won the volleyball league and the other football league. Fans, and some non-fans from both cities would be terribly disappointed if this pattern were to break.The southern scarcityBut for all the storied history and legacies of legendary sportsmen, local players find little representation in franchise-based sports.Royal Challengers have been notoriously short on Karnataka players for a long time, and no matter how many times you hear RCB chants during Bengaluru Tests, it’s not a popular policy among their fans. This year, they’ve dipped below their average and have only a solitary local player – 18-year-old Devdutt Padikkal.Virat Kohli with his fans during an RCB training session in Chennai ahead of the IPL 2019 opener•PTI Super Kings aren’t exactly brimming with local talent either. Like last year, they have only two Tamil Nadu players on their roster, and are possibly only getting away without too much trouble because home fans have long since adopted many players as sons of the soil.

‘We’re not old, we’re experienced’Stephen Fleming’s brand new Super Kings side last year was the subject of much trolling because of how old they were. They started the tournament with a last-ditch win, and followed it up by chasing a gigantic total. Most of the trolling began to subside, and by the end of the tournament, Super Kings had out-trolled everybody. Before the start of the new season, Fleming reminded everyone.”We bought, as you guys said last year, an old side. But we prefer to look it as an experienced side because recall does count. Being able to stand up to pressure situations and recall how you dealt with them in the past is a key component in a fast-moving game.”For Royal Challengers, whose captain has constantly cited poor decision-making under pressure to explain their below par recent form, there could be a slight hint in Fleming’s statements.Ee sala whistle poduKohli publicly disowned Royal Challenger’s infamous “Ee sala cup namde” chant, both for this season, and retroactively for the last one. Not that they would have been heard over all the whistles anyway.

A BPL final, finally, for Tamim Iqbal

The opener has endured a rocky history at the tournament, studded with injury and off-field controversy, but now he has a chance to put all that behind him

Mohammad Isam07-Feb-2019Tamim Iqbal watched most of the 2017 BPL final from the Mirpur press box. It was the day after the Comilla Victorians had lost to the Rangpur Riders in a controversial second qualifier which had to go into a second day due to rain and confusion with the tournament rules.Tamim was left wondering when he would play in the BPL final and emulate some of his celebrated contemporaries. That wish has come true this season, with the Victorians reaching the final after beating the Riders in the first qualifier.”I haven’t done all that bad, despite scoring three ducks in this tournament,” Tamim told ESPNcricinfo. “But considering my expectations, I think I could have done a lot better. I should have scored at least 400 runs by now. I have failed to take off from good starts.”Mashrafe [Mortaza] has won the BPL four times, Shakib [Al Hasan] twice and Riyad [Mahmudullah] has played the final on two occasions. Like them, I have always wanted to play in the final of the biggest domestic tournament in Bangladesh.”It’s finally happening for Tamim, after multiple seasons of disappointment, both on and off the field.In the inaugural edition, a groin injury only allowed him to play two matches. Months after the tournament was over, Tamim revealed that he had not been paid by the Chittagong Kings. He also divulged details of a bust-up with Kings’ technical director Dean Jones who denied abusing him verbally.In the 2013 edition, Tamim made three fifties for Duronto Rajshahi, another franchise where players endured payment delays. So much so, that before their game against Khulna Royal Bengals, Tamim was about to lead out a side without any overseas players – they were all protesting the delayed payments. A last-minute deal was struck between the players and BCB officials, which avoided any further embarrassment.Tamim Iqbal and Tillakaratne Dilshan have a chat with the umpire•Daily Kaler KanthoIn 2015, Tamim got tangled in another mess at another franchise. As he walked out to bat for Chittagong Vikings, Tamim noticed that Josh Cobb and Ravi Bopara, whose names hadn’t been part of the team sheet at the toss, had taken the field for Sylhet Superstars. He pointed it out to the umpires and went back to the dressing room with opening partner Tillakaratne Dilshan. This was after the toss had been delayed, since the NOCs of Cobb and Bopara hadn’t arrived on time. Their names hadn’t been part of the Vikings team sheet distributed to broadcasters and the press box either.Tamim pointed out the two players who had, technically, taken the field illegally. In the argument that played out near the boundary line, BCB officials tried to convince Tamim to let Sylhet play with Cobb and Bopara. In the argument that followed, the Sylhet franchise owner, Tamim alleged, abused him, and “said something very unpleasant about my family”.The following season, 2016, was an excellent one for Tamim personally, as he topped the run charts with 476 runs at an average of 43.27, but his team, the Vikings, went out in the Eliminator.Off-field controversy returned in 2017, when Tamim called the Mirpur pitches “horrible” after they kept producing low-scoring totals even after the venue took a 10-day break. The BCB took exception to Tamim’s expression of frustration, although other players including Mashrafe had made similar comments. In the following days he would face an inquiry for his outburst in the media.Compared to all that, this season has been a time of peace and quiet for Tamim in the BPL. He has stayed away from captaincy in the Vikings setup and, although he is heavily involved in planning, prefers being surrounded by cricket rather than anything else. And if he can get his hands on the trophy, he can finally put behind him his fractious history with the tournament.

Why do we think Test chases of over 300 aren't all that tough?

Despite the evidence of history, we continue to pin our hopes on teams chasing 300-plus in the fourth innings in Tests

Jarrod Kimber12-Jan-2019Something doesn’t feel right. The ball thumps into Roshen Silva’s pads and England go up, but it feels like a theatre appeal. No one truly believes it. Sri Lanka started their chase needing over 300 runs and they still need over 150. Their top four are gone, but luck, fate, momentum, or whatever made-up thing you hold dear, is on their side.The partnership has gone past 50, which is over 16% of the chase, and these two now appear permanent at the crease. Despite the early wickets, the tough pitch and England having a plethora of bowlers, you can see how Sri Lanka will win the second Test.There’s a noise that cricket fans make in chases like this, as if cricket’s global consciousness tightens at once, and it squeaks. In a Test chase, partnerships bring this extra sense of assurance. Fans of the chasing side dare to dream, bowling fans panic, and cricket seems to be on the verge of making something magical happen. A lucky swipe that lands in a gap is no longer seen as a sign a wicket is coming; it’s proof the game has changed. Oh, look, now crows are on the outfield; clearly they signify the death of this bowling attack.All rational thinking suggests that the chasing side almost never wins when they chase big totals. We’ve seen them fail to do so our entire cricketing lives. Depending on your age, you’ve seen this in our incredible current batting era, the great Test years from the ’70s to the ’90s, or before that, in the days of uncovered pitches. And yet here you are, with all that cricket-watching knowledge and plenty of stories from your grandparents. You’ve read the books, swiped the notifications, listened to the wireless and sat in front of countless illegal streams, and yet you still believe.We don’t behave rationally in chases. In the history of Tests, a target of 300-plus has been set 666 times; only 30 times has the chase been successful. No matter how much this partnership feels like an indestructible force because of whatever cricket god you pray to, or what your cricket senses are telling you, the bowling team almost always wins with runs on the board. Despite your raised heart rate, in 300-plus chases, only 4.5% of the times do the batsmen win. It’s less than a one-in-20 shot.England win by 57 runs.***This decade, teams have won 3.2% of chases over 300. It’s the lowest – by a distance – since the 1960s, when pitches were still uncovered. This decade also has the highest percentage of 300-plus chases set – 53% of all chases. So batsmen have never had to chase this many big totals before, and they’ve rarely been worse at it.Fourth-innings batting has been a struggle this decade, as you can see from the runs-per-wicket average, which has dropped 15.4% from the last decade. It’s the lowest average decades-wise since the 1910s. It’s a batsman’s game for three innings, then the bowlers take charge. (The 1940s looks like nothing else in fourth-innings history because it only had 27 fourth innings, which included a couple of big drawn scores, and a world-record chase.)

It’s only a decade ago that fourth-innings batting was solid. Techniques have changed a lot in that time, but maybe pitches are also being allowed to slightly decay more, after the CEO pitches of the 2000s that were built to last five days. You could argue that there have been more fourth innings in Asia than ever before this decade, and Asia is a tough place to bat in the fourth innings. (In the ’90s it was the second worst place to bat in the fourth innings, but in the ’70s, ’80s and 2000s it was the worst.)So more Tests there would explain this dip, except, the fourth-innings average in Asia hasn’t dipped like in other places. Despite the fact that limited-overs cricket has probably had more effect in Asia than anywhere else – perhaps bar the West Indies – the fall in Asia is only 3.5 runs per innings from the 2000s. And I say that only as a comparison to the drop elsewhere. In the West Indies it has dropped over six runs, in Zimbabwe and South Africa it has dropped over eight runs, and in England, the drop has been nine runs. This means for this decade Asia has been among the better places to bat last.It is clear that batsmen haven’t scored so few runs in the fourth innings in the last 100 years. All this while batsmen have dominated Tests. Batting in the fourth innings is tough, but it varies depending on what you chase.Even through their period of supremacy Australia still carried the stigma of struggling in smaller chases. Pakistan have carried it seemingly forever. Australia have succeeded in 73% of fourth-innings chases of between 100 and 200 runs, whereas the overall success rate for that kind of chase is 69%. West Indies have the best record here, with 75% success.Pakistan’s reputation is not misplaced: their record in those chases is 63%, which even for Asia (68% of all such chases in Asia end in defeat for the chasing team) is really low. South Africa, for all their reputation as chokers in ODI cricket, are successful in 74% of these chases. It does mean, however, that even the best teams only win three out of four in what is thought of as a relatively simple chase. Bowling teams who set targets between 100 and 200 have won 46 of 297 matches, making it about a one in six chance.

Teams that chase under 100 have won 264 times, and lost only twice, so you have a 97% chance of getting those targets.The interesting thing with chases of 200 to 250 is that it’s a 50-50 win-loss situation. That target has been set 166 times, and if you set aside the 60 draws and one tie, there have been 53 wins and 52 losses.But it seems like 250 – and not the more symbolic 300 – is where chases get tough. History says that one in almost three times, a target of between 201 and 250 will be chased down, but you’re nearer one in five (18%) if the target is between 251 and 300.That drops to one in ten once you look at 300 to 350. Which is obviously where most of the successful chases over 300 have been made. But every run over 300 just makes it so much harder. So if you are chasing over 350 you are worse than a four-in-100 shot.

It’s not that the psychology of short chases doesn’t exist either. Chasing a smaller total should be quite easy, yet it brings back thoughts of what batsmen fear: failure. You can’t fail in a big chase; you are – despite moments of grand delusion – expected to lose. In small chases you’re supposed to win, so you can only do what everyone thinks you will, or fail tragically.Imagine being a batsman in one of these small chases where there has been a slight wobble before you. The ball is short of a length, 130kph, and bounces right into the zone from which you have played 10,000 back-foot punches through covers. But your arms are tighter, you’re not feeling okay, the bloke at the other end is having trouble with the footmarks, and you think the next batsman in is soft, so you half-play your safest shot. The ball hits an indentation on the pitch, holds up the slightest amount, and balloons to cover-point. Then the next player strides in, gets two streaky boundaries, benefits from some panicked overthrows and the bowling’s team back is broken.Somehow in fourth-innings chases, we as cricket watchers convince ourselves – because of one ball sometimes – the least likely result will occur. Whatever that is. But if that’s true in small chasing totals, it’s never more obvious than in large totals.The first successful 300-plus chase was completed in 1902. England set Australia 315, Clem Hill made 97 before Hugh Trumble’s unbeaten 62 won the game. We’ve had 29 since then. Some are legendary, like Don Bradman and Arthur Morris for the Invincibles in Leeds in 1948. India’s chase of 403 against West Indies changed the way West Indies played their cricket, and therefore how everyone played their cricket. And there was West Indies’ own world-record chase against a near unbeatable Australian team in 2003. Until 1980, it had happened just nine times. The frequency of successful chases per Test hasn’t changed much; just seen a lot more because see more Tests.This is why teams will continue to bat first when winning the toss. Despite what has been said about T20 and batting second, for international cricket, the best chance of winning in T20 or Tests is batting first. Even accounting for the difference in sample sizes (because the formats have not been around for the same amount of time), the fact is, batting first still seems to work.

Chasing has always been tough. Think of all the things that can go wrong in a chase. And it’s important to factor them in because they happen often. The pitches break up through wear and tear, or they are designed to. Either way, batting in the last innings has always been grim.Limited-overs cricket might have made chases feel more comfortable, but there has been no significant transfer of all these skills to Tests. Michael Bevan might have given us a template for chasing, but his plans were ODI-based. Batsmen now prepare more than ever for limited-overs cricket and those skills often work well in Tests when the pitch is still relatively flat, or consistent with bounce. But as it breaks up, swinging at balls in your wheelhouse, premeditating shots, and backing your instincts is hard. Power doesn’t help as much when something fizzes out of the footholes. You don’t have to overcome cracks too often in limited-overs cricket. It’s not that batsmen are less skilful, it’s that they are a different kind of skilled: less soft hands, more fast hands.Even a team of expert chasers like Bevan, Virat Kohli, MS Dhoni and Kieron Pollard wouldn’t be sure things chasing on a fourth or fifth day. Those guys do it on pitches that haven’t deteriorated, in a format of the game that is set up to make it about as easy to set a total as chase it. They don’t even have to factor in draws.In Tests, there are significant differences to chasing in limited-overs. The first is the ball. The white ball isn’t as good as the red one, and it doesn’t last well; it ends up as little more than something for batsmen to hit. The red ball lasts longer, swings for longer, seams for longer, and can be replaced in big enough chases by a brand spanking new one.Then there are the physical differences. You are more tired on day four or five. You react slower to the ball deviating, and you will not have the same power to hit boundaries, or speed for runs. But the biggest problem is the mental side. Tired people make poorer decisions. For the bowling team, they can afford a few poor choices, a few technical errors, and some overall blunders. The batting team have a much smaller allowance.And Tests are five days of decisions, not just for captains but for fielders, batsmen and bowlers. Decision fatigue comes in, and your judgement gets worse. If you are chasing 300, unless the pitch is incredible, you will not be going at much quicker than 3.5 runs an over, which means it will take you 514 balls to get there. That is a lot of assessments to make after days of deciding, pushing your body, thinking about the game, and trying to survive a few short balls.That’s before we get to an age-old cricket truth: runs on the board matter. Cricketers are conditioned – through cricket groupthink and the game itself – to bat first and put a total on the board. The shared DNA of cricket has told us that runs on the board matter, and that affects our psychology as cricketers.

And if you want to really how much runs on the board matter, look at chases over 400. There have been 302 set, and only four won. When chasing between 201 and 400, teams have drawn 41% of the time. When chasing over 400, that drops to 19%. For teams chasing 400, historically there has been a one-in-five chance of drawing, and a one-in-75 chance of winning.Think of all the changes in cricket: fitness, pitches, the death of leg-theory, fielding restrictions, and equipment to name but the obvious ones, and yet, after all this time, runs on the board – probably the first boring cricket truth uttered – still holds sway. Batting to chase, batting to survive, is hard.***So I have told you all this. But I do the research anew every time there is a chase. That’s because I don’t entirely trust it. I think perhaps I’ve misremembered; perhaps it has changed, surely batting is getting easier these days. They hit more boundaries now. Young batsmen are born without the crippling fear of the previous generations. Pitches have never been this flat.There were two chases with targets within 25 runs of 300, and one of 399, in the Australia-India series; all times, the chasing team lost•Getty ImagesPart of this is because of all the great things in cricket – the six over cover, the bouncer that swings towards the batsman’s grill, or all of legspin – fourth-innings chases are the most primal.You are watching someone go into the heart of darkness, enter the Coliseum, and throw stones at Goliath. Everything is stacked against them. It always has been, it can’t possibly end well, yet you can’t help hope, or worry. The hero gets the girl; the mother finds her son; even in tragedy, there is a moral redemption. It doesn’t matter if they can, it’s the “maybe they can” that hooks you. The once-in-a-lifetime narrative, the “this time” feel you get. You’re going to see something special and be a small part of it.When England were all out for 230 in Colombo in November, Sri Lanka needed 327 to win the third Test. Sri Lanka had only made that many runs once in the entire series. They looked down, and overnight they were 53 for 4. But Kusal Mendis couldn’t stop middling the ball, and he wasn’t batting like a player who averages in the mid-30s. This was going to be the moment he lived up to the surrounding hype of his potential.And then, he’s run out by a direct hit from the outfield, possibly because they forgot that Jack Leach bowls left-arm but throws right. I’m snapped back to reality; they can’t win this. Obviously.Roshen Silva was at the other end, and if there is anything Silva does at the crease, it’s act like he’s not going anywhere. He edges, nudges and misses, but all seems right, like he knows what he’s doing. Silva keeps going, often wearing his cap, like some throwback to the ’70s cricketer who doesn’t care that much. He’s all late hands, small shots and casual elegance. He seems so unflustered by all this that you can see him trot to victory. But Moeen Ali traps him, England review, and Silva is gone. Again, why would I believe?Silva is the ninth wicket, Sri Lanka still need 101 to win. The highest ever partnership for the last wicket in a fourth innings is 118, between Nathan Astle and Chris Cairns. No other tenth-wicket partnership in a fourth innings has ever passed 87. Malinda Pushpakumara has a top score of 80 in first-class cricket, from ten years ago. Suranga Lakmal has never passed 42 in Tests. The highest fourth-innings partnership to win a match is 57, between Inzamam-ul-Haq and Mushtaq Ahmed. I know all of this, I have it all in front of me, but…Pushpakumara is slogging the ball, Lakmal’s forward defence is made of granite, and England suddenly look tired. They limp their way through the extra half-hour before tea, and I think, this is something, it’s gonna happen, they will do this. Forget all the history, the numbers, the reality, Pushpakumara even survives a vicious hit from Stuart Broad. And if you need a better sign, straight afterwards he’s right in line, middle of the bat. David just blocked Goliath.Sure, statistically it was a one-in-twenty shot of happening when they started, and now it’s probably one in 100, but maybe, just maybe, this time it will be the one.England win by 42 runs.Stats current up to November 30, 2018

The pall over Rashid Khan's World Cup

England struck Afghanistan where it would hurt them most – by ruthlessly attacking the man who represents their cricket.

Sharda Ugra in Manchester18-Jun-20191:13

Kartik: Stuff of nightmares for Rashid Khan

Two of the three things Afghanistan needed to go right for them on Tuesday did: England batted first and the sun was shining. It was the third element that undid their plans, hopes and confidence. And England did it in a manner no team had in the World Cup so far, despite four defeats. Afghanistan needed their spinners to dominate, led by the man who has been their talisman and their totem in world cricket’s best story in decades. But not only did England dismantle Afghanistan’s bowling, they struck the hardest where it would hurt them most; by ruthlessly attacking the man who represents their cricket, and their standing in world sport.Rashid Khan came into this World Cup ranked second among the highest wicket-takers in the world over the last four years. Enormously deceptive as everyone knew those numbers were (the majority against Zimbabwe and Ireland), Rashid, purveyor of the fine art of leg spin and dispenser of deceptive googlies, was always meant to be Afghanistan’s flag-bearer at this World Cup. England and Old Trafford threw that notion into the wind.At the end of 35th over, England were positioned at 199 for 2 and Eoin Morgan (26 off 24) had made his intentions clear. Rashid had been trying to settle in, having switched ends for the third time (4-0-29-0). Like his team, Rashid had not had the best of World Cups: before Old Trafford he had bowled 22.5 overs in three matches (his team bowled in four, but he didn’t bowl against New Zealand after suffering from a concussion after copping a blow on the helmet off Lockie Ferguson) and taken 3 for 114. It was the time for Rashid to step up, hone in the radar and stamp his presence on the game.Instead, it was to become the place where Rashid was to be schooled by England and their captain. All the bowling horrors of Rashid, (his worst figures, the most expensive figures by a bowler in the World Cup, the most sixes off a bowler in ODIs) were amplified for his team – 198 in the last 15 overs; of which 74 runs came off Rashid. Rather than spotlight one man and his miseries, the spotlight could be turned onto a single event of the day, which marked both Afghanistan’s struggles in the World Cup overall as well as Rashid’s impending doom.In the second ball of his sixth over, Rashid sends one looping across Morgan (on 28) who has good hoick at it, mistimes a slog sweep which heads into deep midwicket’s pocket. Except Dawlat Zadran is too far inside the boundary line, must backpedal and so swats helplessly at the ball. It slaps his fingertips, lobs over his head and bounces over the rope. Morgan lands the next ball into the stands, the first of his seven sixes off Rashid and Rashid the competitor disintegrates. Had the catch been taken – and it was a regulation midwicket skier – who knows what would have transpired; but that is not to deny that this has been a very underwhelming World Cup for Rashid. He is not close to the bowler who beguiled the world through T20 cricket, nor the bowler who has succeeded against far-less threatening opposition and remained a consistent quality performer against the higher-ranked nations.Rashid Khan conceded the second most runs in an innings in ODI history•ESPNcricinfo LtdThe Afghan spinners who have been memorable in this World Cup so far have been Mohammad Nabi, who poleaxed the Sri Lanka middle order in Cardiff, and Mujeeb ur Rahman, who in this boundary-heist in Manchester, conceded 44 off his ten overs. Not Rashid. For a bowler known for his cramping accuracy, hustling pace and illusory angles, Rashid was not allowed to settle by Jonny Bairstow and Joe Root who turned the strike over. Against the left handers, after he had been caned by Morgan, Rashid bowled on both sides of the wicket, unable to hit the perfect length and wavering between too short or too full.At one point, it was like the presence of Rashid Khan itself had evaporated off the field; he is not a large man, in any case, it took a while to single him out on the boundary line or even find him among his teammates as the senior players – Gulbadin Naib, Asghar Afghan and Nabi – confabulated with each other to try and stem the onslaught. There are several reasons for why Rashid’s World Cup has been minus notice. Playing against a higher level of opposition, as opposed to lower ranked nations, in small British grounds could be one of those.Watch on Hotstar (India only) England crack 125 runs from final eight oversYet Rashid’s ODI statistics against the other nine World Cup playing nations coming into this tournament show an average of 13.79 and an economy rate of 3.51. In 683 balls bowled in ODIs to those countries before this tournament, Rashid had conceded only four sixes.Had Afghanistan’s fourth spinner, Rahmat Shah, gone for these figures it would have been more understandable. He would have been quickly taken off the attack; but Afghanistan couldn’t possibly demonstrate such a lack of faith against their highest achiever. Just as much as Rashid has been studied and dissected by the opposition, so has he run into many of these players in the world’s various T20 leagues. On Tuesday, Rashid was asked questions only he can answer: is he suffering from the yips that the World Cup has landed in his lap, one defeat after another, against opponents that throw up far more rounds of give and take than he can take? Or did the concussion have greater after-effects than we were led to believe?What has not changed is how his team sees him: after the England innings ended, the Afghan players gathered towards each other near the crease, soberly clapping, shaking hands and giving each other a pat on the shoulder. The man furthest away from them took the longest time from the long square boundary to get to where they were. When he got closest, Rashid Khan’s team surrounded him, arms around his shoulders, pats on his back heartfelt even from a distance. Afghanistan’s champion had been bruised and beaten but they are willing him to fight another day. Because they are him and he is them. All for one and one for all.

Super sub Marnus Labuschagne steps into the breach for Australia

The first concussions substitute in the history of Test cricket did more than his bit to help stave off an Australia defeat

Daniel Brettig at Lord's18-Aug-2019No one in the 142-year history of Test match cricket had done what Marnus Labuschagne managed on day five at Lord’s in 2019.No one previously had ever woken up on the final morning of a game not knowing whether or not he would be part of the playing XI, and by day’s end been the key bulwark against a revved up and desperate bowling attack to help secure a battling draw for his team in fading light. No one had done so to preserve a 1-0 series lead either.No one had ever had to contemplate coming into the crucible of a Test match at such short notice, but Labuschagne was ready for all eventualities. “Earlier is always better because you can actually start training your mind to relax and focus on the game where you are not sitting on the edge,” he has said. “If it is the night before you are still sitting on the edge, but sometimes you don’t get a choice, you just have to deal with it.”ALSO READ: Smith hoping to be fit for Headingley after ‘mild concussion’No one had ever had to deal with being brought into a team for the final day of a Test match as a substitute, having witnessed his team’s batting inspiration Steven Smith be invalided out of the game with a sickening blow from Jofra Archer and delayed-onset concussion. No one had ever come in to bat with 42.3 overs remaining and facing that same bowler, be greeted second ball by a vicious bouncer that clanged into the grille of their helmet.No one had responded to the blow by leaping back up almost immediately, as if spring loaded, waving away England’s players reflexively, then insisting through his on-field concussion test by the team doctor Richard Saw that all was well. No one had held their nerve as Archer sent numerous deliveries with the new ball scorching past the outside edge, playing the line and covering the off stump but not following any of the movement still wrought from the pitch.No one had remained unflustered, finding regular opportunities to score, as England’s spells grew steadily more desperate, the sky grew darker, and the Australia balcony moved from early apprehension to growing confidence in their substitute in the middle. No one had played the ball late, under the eyes, without edging wretchedly like David Warner, statuesquely like Usman Khawaja, or being pinned lbw on the crease like Cameron Bancroft.No one had ever been subbed into a Test match and found himself seeking to calm the nerves of a jittery Travis Head, who might easily have been out three times in the first over he faced from Jack Leach, and should have been out when he edged Ben Stokes to Jason Roy in the slips with 19.5 overs still remaining. No one had kept calm when Leach spun balls wickedly out of the rough, countering him by using a sweep that if it did not make contact, at least presented an impassable barrier to the stumps.Marnus Labuschagne goes down after being hit•Getty ImagesNo one had cleaned up after an increasingly shabby Australian performance, in which at least five catches went down and a succession of decision reviews were either made or not made in error. No one had spared the blushes of the captain Tim Paine after he chose to bowl first, then saw conditions, pitch and opposition leave the tourists well and truly cornered on the final day, as Stokes, Jos Buttler and Jonny Bairstow found batting rhythm and confidence in ways that will make England’s middle order much more of a formidable adversary in the remainder of the series.No one had come into day five of a Test match in England with more comprehensive preparation, confidence and methodical rigour, honed over several summers playing the game in this part of the world, in between Australian summer assignments for Queensland. “My experiences in England, I was here in 2013 and 2014 playing club cricket, and this year playing county cricket, all my experiences have been great,” Labuschagne said before the series. “I’ve loved the conditions, the challenge of the conditions, the things you need to be better at in England than Australia.”I’ve got individual plans for each bowler, things that you do slightly different to guys that run the ball back in or swing it away and a bit more pace, a bit less pace, there’s small changes but the fundamental side of things doesn’t change. There’s small things you try and do and create to bring things into your favour, I think that’s the art of batting, there’s definitely things you tinker with.”No one had found themselves trying to fill the shoes of Smith, having earned in the earlier days of this tour a similar reputation for obsession with the art of batting, being heard tapping his bat in the dead of night at the team’s hotels in Southampton, Birmingham, Worcester and London. No one had tried to glean more from Smith, about bats, batting or the game as a whole, at every possible moment.”I’ve had a few discussions with Smudge about batting. I think we are both quite cricket nuffs,” Labuschagne said. “I love batting in my room, tapping the ball up, so there’s always questions floating around about whose tapping the bat at 11 o’clock at night … I feel like we are always the ones to blame. It’s great he’s played 70 Tests and he’s averaging 62? 61? Unbelievable player, so as much as I can learn from him as possible and he’s played in these conditions before so we’ve talked a little bit about that.”No one had ever started a Test match as a spectator and ended it as the central player, hustling to a fifty and then accepting the applause of the Lord’s crowd when he walked off, his team all but safe from harm – all but for a late Leach and Archer flurry that gave England fleeting hope. Labuschagne’s score of 59 had matched, almost exactly, the average in England of the man he subbed.No one had used the opportunity thrust upon them on the final day of a match they had not started to make a compelling case for inclusion for the full duration of the next match, at Headingley from Thursday. No one had made Australia’s fragile batting lineup look stronger, surer, braver and safer. No one had ever been a concussion substitute in Test cricket before Marnus Labuschagne. No one, you imagine, will ever do it better.

The World Cup on social media

ESPNcricinfo staff17-Jul-2019Remember when the World Cup started? It feels like a long while ago, when most of the cricketing world was wondering about when the first 500-plus ODI score would be made, Virat Kohli was peering into his crystal ball and declaring 250 would be hard enough to chase, and Sir Viv Richards was smashing it to all parts of the Mall in central London during the opening ceremony.Here’s the story of a long, memorable tournament, told through the eyes of social media.May 29

May 31
While every other expert was predicting semi-finalists and winners, Brendon McCullum went many steps further and put out his results for every game of the league phase. He even predicted the impact rain would have on the tournament.

View this post on Instagram

World Cup game by game predictions. 4 teams will fight out the 4th qualifying spot and net run rate will decide who progresses. Rain and luck will likely play a part as well. I hope Nz gets that little bit of luck and can qualify. Enjoy the 6 week celebration of the best players on the planet. #CWC2019

A post shared by Brendon McCullum (@bazmccullum42) on May 31, 2019 at 12:13am PDT

The other Pakistan turned up for their first game against West Indies, for a good reason, as we found out soon enough.

June 1
Ben Stokes and Co finished eighth in the Under-19 World Cup eight years ago. How far could they go this time, at home?

June 2
These two were welcomed by fans dressed as sandpaper sheets in Bristol.

June 3
England were favourites, and they hadn’t lost chasing at home for 20 successive games, but none of that mattered, because they were facing the Pakistan.

June 4
In one of the lines of the tournament, Pakistan bowling coach Azhar Mahmood had said, “England have to play 300 balls to get to that record, but we have to bowl ten good balls to get ten wickets.” Turns out he was off by a ball.

June 6
AB de Villiers wasn’t even at the World Cup, but news about his near return from retirement sent shock waves through the cricket world.

June 9
Twitter superstar Jimmy Neesham turned it on with the ball, picking up his first five-wicket haul in international cricket. The self-deprecation that followed was just as good.

June 10
A high-profile retirement came early in the tournament, just as India were finding their range in a World Cup.

View this post on Instagram

Enjoy retirement Legend @yuvisofficial

A post shared by Stuart Broad (@stuartbroad8) on Jun 10, 2019 at 3:17am PDT

June 14
Everyone said it at the start of the World Cup, but Michael Vaughan served a mid-tournament reminder, in case you’d missed it.

As many as four games were washed out in the space of a week, one of them being the New Zealand-India encounter. Neesham’s gesture to disappointed fans at Trent Bridge came in for praise on social media, before…

June 15
The memes were out in full force. Maybe rain had dropped the World Cup?

India-Pakistan was just around the corner. Not everyone had to pick one side, as Chris Gayle reminded us.

View this post on Instagram

Yup! I’m rocking my india Pakistan Suit, all love and respect!… I really love it and this will be one of my outfit at my birthday party September 20th…its lit #FashionOverStyle #UniverseBoss #KingGayle #45 #333 #Suit @sidbafna #Attiitude #CWC19

A post shared by KingGayle (@chrisgayle333) on Jun 15, 2019 at 5:16am PDT

June 16
India v Pakistan at Old Trafford wasn’t entirely one-sided, but it wasn’t quite a treat either. Try telling that to the press pack, though.

While Indian fans were in overdrive, revelling in the victory over their neighbours, Stokes left a note to everyone reminding them he was getting bored.

Three centuries from Rohit Sharma and the recently retired Yuvraj Singh was predicting that his former India and Mumbai Indians team-mate would go all the way, just like he himself had done in 2011.

June 17
Rohit sent a square-cut six flying into the stands. You knew the throwbacks were coming.

His press conference performances were even better. It all started here.

Old Trafford cricket ground, Theatre of Dreams. Who knew?

View this post on Instagram

Old Trafford is really the 'Theatre of Dreams' #CWC19 #INDVSPAK #dreamdebut #gratefulandblessed

A post shared by Vijay shankar (@vijay_41) on Jun 16, 2019 at 2:44pm PDT

Meanwhile, Bangladesh were motoring along, carried largely by one man’s sustained excellence.

June 18
Pakistan were smarting after another World Cup defeat to India. Their fans weren’t sparing them and players took to social media appealing for calm.

June 19
India’s injury scare turned out to be a tournament-ending one. Shikhar Dhawan was on his way home.

Not all great Jofra Archer tweets are from his archives. There was some refreshing candour from him through this tournament as well.

June 22
As the league phase was in danger of turning into a dead-rubber-filled snoozefest, Sri Lanka woke everyone up with a shocking win.

June 23
Carlos Brathwaite, remember the name? Ben Stokes sure does. In case you didn’t, he served another reminder.

But when West Indies fell agonisingly short of winning against New Zealand, it was Brathwaite who had to be consoled.

View this post on Instagram

What a game! Super hitting @ricky.26 @cricketworldcup #cwc19

A post shared by Ross Taylor (@rossltaylor3) on Jun 22, 2019 at 2:36pm PDT

June 27
Pakistan were back in business and making a late surge for the qualifying spots. Remember when it last happened?

June 28
England were on the mat after two successive defeats, to Sri Lanka and Australia, and Jonny Bairstow laid into his “critics”. Fellow Yorkshireman Vaughan wasn’t having any of it.

June 29
There were plenty of great catches at this World Cup, but it didn’t get better than a full-blooded Steven Smith pull caught at leg gully, and certified by one of the greatest modern-day close-catchers.

By this point, the 1992 parallels were getting more uncanny by the day.

South Africa’s tournament had few silver linings. Imran Tahir’s performance in his final ODI tournament was one of them.

June 30
With one injury after another, some former players wondered if something was afoot in the Indian camp.

July 1
The runs were flowing for David Warner and there was some happy news for him on the personal front too. Newlands seemed a long time ago.

July 2
Up in Durham, there was a surprise visitor for West Indies’ game against Sri Lanka.

View this post on Instagram

When Rihanna met the Universe Boss #CWC19 #cricket #lovecricket #MenInMaroon

A post shared by Cricket World Cup (@cricketworldcup) on Jul 1, 2019 at 12:02pm PDT

TV broadcasters spotted 87-year-old Charulata Patel blowing a horn and rooting for India during their game against Bangladesh. Soon enough, she became an internet sensation.

View this post on Instagram

Also would like to thank all our fans for all the love and support and especially Charulata Patel ji. She's 87 and probably one of the most passionate and dedicated fans I've ever seen. Age is just a number, passion takes you leaps and bounds. There was only love and blessings for the whole team in her eyes. What an inspiration. With her blessings, on to the next one.

A post shared by Virat Kohli (@virat.kohli) on Jul 2, 2019 at 11:13am PDT

July 3
There were only eight league games in the 1992 World Cup. By the time the ninth game came along in this World Cup, Pakistan were in uncharted waters, having left themselves with too much to do.

July 5
Their campaign was over, and so was one of the last surviving international careers from the 20th century.

July 6
Master and protege reunited, less than two months after teaming up to win the IPL.

July 7
Bangladesh’s campaign that had promised so much ended up with an unflattering position on the points table.

July 11
India bowed out of the World Cup, but not before Ravindra Jadeja had played one the finest knocks in a World Cup semi-final.

In the black corner, the victors were marching on, on and on to Lord’s.

View this post on Instagram

How good?! Off to the big dance once more! #CWC19 #BACKTHEBLACKCAPS

A post shared by Ross Taylor (@rossltaylor3) on Jul 10, 2019 at 8:45am PDT

Arguably the most memorable New Zealand performance on the day came from the commentary box, from Ian Smith.

Is this the end for MS Dhoni? We don’t know, but Adam Gilchrist dropped a thank you note in advance.

Only three teams were left in the competition, and pre-match nervousness gave way to full-blown schadenfreude for England fans. Australia’s barefoot-walking routine was an unfortunate victim.

July 12
The AB de Villiers saga wasn’t going away anytime soon.

July 13

The stories of elderly Indian fans enjoying the game were among the most heartwarming of the tournament.

July 14
An epic Wimbledon final. A World Cup final for the ages. It was a day to remember for sports fans.

Of course, a Jofra tweet had called the ending.

July 15
New Zealand didn’t lose the final, didn’t lose the Super Over, but went home without a trophy yet again.

Naturally, there were contrasting emotions from both sides.

'Mental health is a big challenge. It is a tough game' – Rahul Dravid

The NCA director opens up on the upcoming Under-19 World Cup, new paths Indian cricket must walk, and much more

Saurabh Somani in Lucknow29-Nov-20194:31

India’s fast bowlers are all ‘role models’ – Dravid

India Under-19 and India A have been almost unbeatable since you took charge, winning against all teams everywhere. What do you think has gone right?
I think there’s a lot of talent in this country, for starters. More than winning – which I’ve always said is not a marker by which I honestly judge the success of a programme at this level – for the success of any of these developmental programmes [what matters] is how many of the players can we move on to the next level. The heartening thing for me is that, if you go back over the last three or four years that I’ve been involved in this – it’s not just me, obviously a lot of other coaches and people have been involved – is for us to see how many have gone on to become established players in their Ranji Trophy teams. Some of them have gone on to their teams at 21.I’d like to believe that in this cycle, over the last 14-16 months, nearly 40-45 boys have played for India Under-19. I think that’s the real credit. I’m really hoping that within the next two years, at least 30-35 of them go into first-class teams. If 10-15 of them establish themselves in their first-class teams, that will be a success for us.But the increase in performance and results has been more marked since you’ve taken over. Is there something being done that wasn’t done previously?
We’ve been able to convince the board and ensure the boys are playing more cricket at this level. I definitely feel there needs to be a step-up in level. For our Under-19 boys, there needs to be a step-up from Under-19 domestic tournaments if we want to develop these boys to be able to establish themselves quickly in first-class cricket. To do that we need to give them a slightly higher level of cricket. Same thing with India A. Our domestic cricket is good, but the India A programme is critical.ALSO READ: IPL teams ‘missing a trick’ by not using more Indian coaches – DravidThe good thing for us is that a lot of other countries play a lot of their international players in the ‘A’ teams, whereas we might focus more on younger players. Maybe because their numbers are smaller. I have played against teams like South Africa and Australia A, who had seven or eight of their international players in the team against you. That is really good competition and the standard is definitely higher than the first-class game, the pressure is more. Then that helps build confidence, if you succeed at that level against some of those guys.The other thing is, whenever we’ve been in control of the pitches, one of the things I’ve tried to do is ensure we play on good, sporting pitches. Leave a lot of grass on it, with a view of long-term development of these players. Not necessarily wanting to win that series, but more like saying, ‘Hey, what’s beneficial to these guys in the longer run?’ It’s actually been quite a satisfying three or four years for me personally. I really hope we can keep this going, and keep building, growing and improving these programmes.

What Ishant, Shami, Umesh, Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Bumrah are doing, is they are actually in a way becoming role models for a lot of younger generation of boys who believe now they can be fast bowlers.Rahul Dravid

How do you rate India’s prospects at the next Under-19 World Cup?
We are very confident with the process and preparation we’ve set up. At the start of the cycle, I tell a lot of these guys who are pushing for spots: ‘We’ll give you enough opportunities to put your hand up and select yourself.’ And honestly, hand on heart, at least 40-45 boys can say, ‘Hey, we got a chance. We got opportunities.’What might happen at this level is that boys miss out in a particular year. They’re all growing still. I see this a lot at this age, that people have bad years. You see them playing very well one year and then suddenly they struggle the next. So they don’t get picked on form. But I always try and tell them, ‘Don’t worry, it’s not about getting selected for the World Cup. In the long run, nobody’s going to remember if you played in the Under-19 World Cup or not.’It’s about: Can I become a successful first-class cricketer and from there, go on to play for India? There will be very good players who are going to miss out on the final 15. But like I always them, ‘Don’t lose heart. It’s just one World Cup. It doesn’t define your career. You will go back and play Under-23, play for your first-class teams, and in one or two years you can easily catch up with some of these boys who have played in the World Cup.’Just because you’ve played a World Cup doesn’t mean you will play for India, and just because you haven’t played a World Cup doesn’t mean you won’t. It’s a nice achievement to have, but it’s not the be-all and end-all of everything. Look at Ruturaj Gaikwad and Devdutt Padikkal – they didn’t make our World Cup squad. And they have started doing really well for their first-class teams.What would you say is India’s strength?
We have got a good balance in the team. We probably had more good allrounders in last year’s team. People like Kamlesh [Nagarkoti] and Shivam [Mavi] could all bat. So last year’s World Cup team could bat all the way to No. 10. But this year too, the selectors have done a pretty good job in picking a good side. Depending on the conditions in South Africa, if they aid fast bowlers, we have got a pretty good attack. We have got batting all the way down to seven-eight-nine. We have got spinners, if conditions suit.India captain Prithvi Shaw and coach Rahul Dravid hold the World Cup trophy•ICC/Getty ImagesThe issue of mental health is in the spotlight at the moment. What would you advise younger players on this so that they can deal with it best?
It is a big challenge. This is a tough game. There is so much competition, a lot of pressure, and kids are playing all year round now. It is a game in which you do sometimes spend a lot of time waiting around, having a lot of time to think.So, you really need to look after yourself on and off the field, and look after stuff like mental health. That’s again something that, as much as we talk to these boys about, it’s really important to maintain a certain level of balance in everything you do. Be able to find that balance between not getting too excited when you succeed and not getting too disappointed when you fail. I just think being able to lead a slightly balanced life potentially helps.We are also putting a few things in place at the NCA wherein we want to be able to give people an opportunity to talk about these things and address some of these things, and have people that they can speak to. So, yes, there has been some work on that as well, wherein eventually we’ll get to a point where hopefully we should have professionals on board. I think sometimes some of these things need to be handled by professionals.I don’t think some of the coaches, or some of us, have the ability to deal with some of the issues. Some things we might be able to, but there may be some things where we might need to look at professional help. It’s one of the things we are definitely keen on doing at the NCA: giving some of these boys access to some level of professional help if they do require it.There’s been a renaissance in Indian fast bowling at the international level. Do you see the same sort of enthusiasm among fast bowlers coming up?
Yes, definitely. Every year now in Under-19 cricket, we’ve had some very good fast bowlers. Last time, we had three of them in Kamlesh, Shivam and Ishan [Porel]. This year also you will see some good fast bowlers in the team.When you have role models and you have heroes like the senior team… I think what Ishant [Sharma], [Mohammed] Shami, Umesh [Yadav], Bhuvneshwar Kumar and [Jasprit] Bumrah are doing, is they are actually in a way becoming role models for a lot of younger generation of boys who believe now they can be fast bowlers. They can bowl fast and be successful in India. It’s great to see that. Obviously we had people like Kapil [Dev], Sri [Javagal Srinath], Zaheer [Khan] and all in the past. But as a group, this is probably one of the best fast-bowling attacks we have ever had. I think that’s a great inspiration for a lot of these young boys.

Just because you’ve played a World Cup doesn’t mean you will play for India, and just because you haven’t played a World Cup doesn’t mean you won’t. It’s a nice achievement to have, but it’s not the be all and end all of everything.Rahul Dravid

In the past, crowds in India would come to see batsmen. Do you think in the future they’ll be going to watch fast bowlers intimidating batsmen with pace and bounce?
I hope so. Now that I have retired, I don’t mind the others being intimidated (laughs).A lot of young pace bowlers are coming up, but one of the major concerns are injuries they pick up early in their careers.
It is part and parcel of being a fast bowler. Unfortunately, it’s a very unnatural activity. One of the things that has improved in India is the focus on fitness and physiotherapy, the care that we are able to give. Some of the facilities that our Under-19 boys have today are amazing; access to some of the best physios and trainers at the NCA. Indian teams of the past didn’t have that kind of support. It is there, but you will still have injuries.Fast bowling, especially for young bodies with people still growing up and developing, it’s just going to happen. We have to get better at managing it. But unfortunately, in this sport, there’s no such thing as: ‘I will keep playing, and I will keep bowling fast and not get injured (chuckles).’ Unfortunately, it doesn’t work like that, so you have to accept it and work out ways to minimise that – that’s all we can do. Will we ever get to a stage where we will have no injuries? Unfortunately, not.As science develops, as research improves… that’s again an area we need to do a little bit more, in research – on our own bodies, our own bowlers, right from junior and camp level. We are doing a little bit of that now, starting it at the NCA and zonal camps. We are doing more research, collecting more data and information on our cricketers. We are using data and research that has been done on different bodies [than ours]: Caucasians, English and Australian players.We need to do our research, we need to do data collection on our own athletes and that will give us insights. A lot of that process has already started; it’s been going on for about two years now and all that is helping us in a large way. We need to keep doing more of that and improve at that. That’s really one of the things I want to drive forward at the NCA level as well.What are your thoughts on the next generation of spinners?
Spin is a little bit more of a challenge. There are a number of good spinners in the country, don’t get me wrong. But because of the amount of white-ball cricket, which has increased with Twenty20 cricket and there are so many domestic tournaments with the white-ball, it’s a bit tougher for younger spinners to balance that. That’s one of the challenges we face at the Under-19 level: for young spinners to find that balance between white-ball and red-ball cricket.Going ahead, that’s one of our goals. We want to try and work with our spinners, help them improve. How do they make those adjustments? It’s not that easy for spinners to do it. There is a challenge from the ranks coming up. But we are still producing good spinners, don’t get me wrong. Even at Under-19, we have got some good spinners. But this adjustment from Under-19 cricket to first-class cricket has probably been, from my experience, easier for batsmen and fast bowlers. It hasn’t been that easy for spinners. So, we have to keep working on it.Getty ImagesYou’re no longer just the head coach of the Under-19 team or the ‘A’ team, you’re NCA director now. How has your role changed?
It’s changed a little bit in the sense that this time it’s not as much hands-on with a lot of these boys. I have been around with them, I was in England and I came here as well. But it’s also really about working with the coaches we’ve had. We’ve got some really good coaches for these guys at the moment – Paras [Mhambrey], Hrishi [Hrishikesh Kanitkar] and Abhay [Sharma]. Top-class coaches, very experienced, who’ve been in the system.Paras and Abhay have been with me on both the other World Cups. So, this really gives us an opportunity to not only develop players, but also develop our coaches. This is a platform where we should also be developing and growing our coaches, so we’ve tried to do that at the Under-19 and India A level. That’s also part of my role as well now. It’s slightly broader in terms of also helping us identify and develop the next generation of coaches coming through, giving them a lot more responsibility. Yes, I’m involved, and around. I’m here and might probably go to the World Cup for some part, maybe the start or during the preparation phase. But really, I think it’s been about giving them a lot more freedom and allowing them to develop and grow.Through the NCA we’re also going to try and help a lot of our coaches. We’ve hired Sujith [Somasundar] now, who has come on as head of education. A part of our goal is to create a programme for coaches as well, so that we can give them certain skills in which they can develop – and hopefully then get the opportunities to work at a slightly higher level. I think a lot of IPL teams miss a trick by not using more domestic talent in the coaching area and the talent identification area, even if it is as assistants. That’s my personal opinion.Ever since Sourav Ganguly took charge as the president of the BCCI, he has said his priority will be first-class cricket. What are the areas that require changes in first-class cricket?
It’s the small things in the system that Sourav probably was mentioning – like ensuring security for first-class players, the quality of our pitches, the quality of the facilities that first-class and Under-19 cricketers get to train in, practice in. Fitness, physiotherapy… all of these things have improved, but it’s just a constant process. You just have to keep getting better at it..For many, many years now, we’ve got a pretty successful system going. We play a lot of matches, people get opportunities. You just need to keep improving them. Attention to small things, attention to detail, I would say is something we can maybe focus on and do a bit better. There’s no such thing as a perfect system. You always learn, and you always improve. That’s true of players, systems, competitions and everything really.Does the IPL still remain a favourite route to gain attention quicker than other formats?
I wouldn’t say that. In the Twenty20 format, yes, maybe. But I think the selectors have also been very good, in the sense that they are expecting people to do well in the Ranji Trophy as well. So, whether it is a Shubman Gill or a Prithvi Shaw from the last batch who came in, if you look at their performances, they have got into the Indian team not only based on their IPL runs, but really on their Ranji Trophy runs, their India A runs.So, the selectors are not only looking at IPL performances. In the conversations and discussions I have with them, it becomes very clear to me that they have put a lot of value on domestic cricket, they have put a lot of value on domestic runs, India A runs. That is really good to see. If the selectors drive that, then people will understand that it’s important.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus